1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa [10]
4 years ago
6

How is organizing the past by theme different from organizing the past by future ?

History
1 answer:
Vlad1618 [11]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

How is organizing the past by region similar to or different from organizing the past by period? ... A historian who organizes the past by region focuses on a big idea that occurs across history, whereas a historian who organizes the past by period focuses on a specific area of the world.

You might be interested in
Help now pls bby pls
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

Commas

Explanation:

Victor was standing in the driest place on Earth. In some parts of the Atacama Desert, not a single drop of water had been seen for decades. On his back, Victor's gear seemed especially heavy. He had food, clothes, and water for the next 250 kilometers. Could he make it? Yes, he could. While he waited for the race to begin, Victor's heart pounded. Above the desert, wispy clouds crossed the deep blue sky.

8 0
3 years ago
Answer both questions
Zolol [24]

Answer:

first is C second is B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
I’m 1935, the German government passed laws stating that Jews were
dlinn [17]

It essentially said that the Jews were not human and were to be treated as such. The goal of the Nuremburg Laws was to distinguish what Nazi Germany perceived as ethnically pure and impure populations. It assigned people with Jewish heritage as property of the state, giving them no rights. Jews were also strictly prohibited from reproducing. The Nuremburg laws also gave strict ethnic standards to the rest of the German people, which classified them based on their ancestors race.

8 0
3 years ago
Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed.

Explanation:

I just did this and it was right but from my understanding patriots didn't want nobody to have freedom instead give up their freedom for security but the loyalists wanted everybody to have freedom and everybody to live how they want.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the name of the first political party in the united states? pol 201 week 4?
Nady [450]
The Federalist party
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the colonial governments of the Spanish and English colonies differ? A. Spanish colonies were controlled by the Spanish
    12·1 answer
  • The Constitution allows Congress to
    8·1 answer
  • Do you believe that European Colonizers were immoral in their actions towards native populations
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the eastern united states do you think most new immigrants settled? Why?
    6·1 answer
  •  The framers of the constitution created a system of checks and balances of government could restrain each other. Explain how ea
    8·1 answer
  • The abolition of slavery entitled the south to more seats in the house of repesnatives
    14·1 answer
  • Economics can best be described as the study of:
    13·2 answers
  • The president pro tempore gives the final vote on a bill<br> True<br> False
    7·1 answer
  • How did the cultural achievements of Tang China influence East Asia?
    11·1 answer
  • In this section of speech Lincoln talks about the work that the union still needs to accomplish. What did the fighting at Gettys
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!