I would say A.) Granting Professional Licenses
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
<span>The social changes which occurred after World War I were:
</span><span>
Increased mobility through technology.</span>
New roles for women.<span>
</span>Breaks with tradition.
It was all because of the women efforts, they received the right to vote and many restrictions on women are taken off. Additionally, as a result of the social change in technology Tanks and Gas warfare technology were introduced.
Slaves worked for free and had to do all hard labor that they were told to do.
Answer:
I believe it to be a violation of the 3rd Amendment
Explanation:
This is my personal answer choice. If it is correct, then I am happy to be of service! If it is incorrect, then I am very sorry.
