I believe the answer is: Ego
According to Freud, Human's ego could give both positive and negative impact. The negative one is it often give a false sense of pride that make us arrogant, the positive one is that it make help us to maintain our core principles (such us choosing not to skip homework)
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
An author may resort to a device called "direct address" when writing a text. This device is used to directly address the reader and make him or her feel included in the text. In addition, authors may convince the audience to share a specific point of view, especially in argumentative texts, when using this resource to express a personal opinion. However, to compensate subjectiveness, effective writing combines direct address with objective information, such as facts, statistics, etc. Both, objective information and direct address should be written within the same paragraph to create a balance between subjectiveness and objectiveness. Thus, option A is not a reason to break a message into sub-messages. Options B, C, and D are in fact, reasons to divide a message because they represent subsections of a text that help the reader understand the different parts of it.
Mike using Rational choice theory perspective
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rational choice theory explains social happenings as consequences of personal choices that can in some way be explained as rational. The fundamental assumption of this theory is that aggregate social practice proceeds from the performance of unique characters, who is executing their personal choices. Selections are “rational” if people face any regularity standard as outlined by a decision theory and are fit to perform precise intentions, given the restrictions of the condition.
Here personal choice of men choosing nursing career is considered and explained that good pay and some more reasons as a consequence in the theoretical perspective of Rational choice theory.
{6+[(4+5)÷3]×2}
{6+[9÷3]×2}
{6+(3×2)}
6+6=12
12#
If you meant to include New Hampshire, it would be that all of the colonies were against Massachusetts policies.
