Heres ze answer C. Printing Press
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include any reference, text, or further context. We do not know what is the topic of controversy.
However, by doing some research we can help you with the following.
If you are referring to the controversy between formal science vs. pseudoscience, then the issues or problems that tend to lead to such controversies are the lack of evidence used by pseudoscientists when trying to prove something.
True scholars and scientists know that the scientific method is the only way to validate a phenomenon. The results can be repeated one, two, and three times, and scientists had to validate the results every single time. Then, we can say that something has scientific support and validation.
On the contrary, pseudoscientists often times do not include validation, just opinions, and general comments based on their own perspectives.
Answer:
The process of Urbanization, which was already underway in most countries before the First World War, gathered pace during the 1920s. This was, in part, linked to economics. Many features of the "Modern Metropolis" were visible before the First World War. Electricity, urban transport networks including underground railways, large department stores and mass entertainment venues, like music halls, were visible in cities such as London, Paris and Berlin. However, after the war, electricity supply was expanded, and rationalized. Music halls were joined and subsequently replace by cinemas, dance halls and jazz clubs, existing urban transport networks were extended and new ones built to service growing numbers of commuters living in emerging suburbs. New forms of transport, such as cars, raised the feel of city life, and increased white-collar employment numbers. This also swelled the ranks of the middle class and fuelled new levels and forms of consumerism.
Hope this helps
Have a nice day((:
Explanation:
Please, I do not understand the question
