All categories

3 years ago

Simplify (2√5+3√7)^2

2 answers:

5 0

(2 sq. root 5 + 3 sq. root 7)(2 sq. root 5 + 3 sq. root 7)

4•sq root 25 + 6 sq. root 35 + 6 sq. root 35 + 9 sq. root 49

4 • 5 + 12 sq. root 35 + 9 • 7

20 + 12 sq. root 35 + 63.

I believe this would be the solution.

Anna35 [415]3 years ago

3 0

The answer is: 83 + 12√35

(a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b²

In (2√5 + 3√7)², a = 2√5, b = 3√7

Just substitute a and b:
(a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b² = (2√5)² + 2 * 2√5 * 3√7 + (3√7)² =
= 2²√5² + 2 * 2 * 3 * √5 * √7 + 3²√7² =
= 4 * 5 + 12 * √(5*7) + 9 * 7 =
= 20 + 12 *√35 + 63 =
= 83 + 12√35

You might be interested in

Somebody please help asapppppp

anzhelika [568]

The function was moved two units to the left (a)

8 0

3 years ago

A roller coaster makes an angle of 55 degrees with the ground. The horizontal distance fro the crest of the hill to the bottom o

Svetradugi [14.3K]

QmvkwmPNPNEFIBGIONRONWI

3 0

3 years ago

In a completely randomized experimental design, three brands of paper towels were tested for their ability to absorb water. Equa

arlik [135]

Answer:

Yes. At this significance level, there is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete:

The significance level is 0.05.

The data is:

Brand X: 91, 100, 88, 89

Brand Y: 99, 96, 94, 99

Brand Z: 83, 88, 89, 76

We have to check if there is a significant difference between the absorbency rating of each brand.

Null hypothesis: all means are equal

$H_0:\mu_x=\mu_y=\mu_z$

Alternative hypothesis: the means are not equal

$H_a: \mu_x\neq\mu_y\neq\mu_z$

We have to apply a one-way ANOVA

We start by calculating the standard deviation for each brand:

$s_x^2=30,\,\,s_y^2=6,\,\,s_z^2=35.33$

Then, we calculate the mean standard error (MSE):

$MSE=(\sum s_i^2)/a=(30+6+35.33)/3=71.33/3=23.78$

Now, we calculate the mean square between (MSB), but we previously have to know the sample means and the mean of the sample means:

$M_x=92,\,\,M_y=97,\,\,M_z=84\\\\M=(92+97+84)/3=91$

The MSB is then:

$s^2=\dfrac{\sum(M_i-M)^2}{N-1}\\\\\\s^2=\dfrac{(92-91)^2+(97-91)^2+(84-91)^2}{3-1}\\\\\\s^2=\dfrac{1+36+49}{2}=\dfrac{86}{2}=43\\\\\\\\MSB=ns^2=4*43=172$

Now we calculate the F statistic as:

$F=MSB/MSE=172/23.78=7.23$

The degrees of freedom of the numerator are:

$dfn=a-1=3-1=2$

The degrees of freedom of the denominator are:

$dfd=N-a=3*4-3=12-3=9$

The P-value of F=7.23, dfn=2 and dfd=9 is:

$P-value=P(F>7.23)=0.01342$

As the P-value (0.013) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ASAP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT AND STRONG ANSWER! THANK YOU IM STRUGGLINGGG

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a3 = 2

d = -5

=============

a4 = a3 - 5

a4 = 2 - 5

a4 = - 3

===============

a5 = a4 - 5

a5 = -3 - 5

a5 = - 8

Just take a4 as your answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Is 12:8 and 18:12 equivalent?

tia_tia [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

18 is not a multiple of 12

and 12 is not a multiple of 8

8 0

3 years ago