Answer:
27 < 5*n +7
n<4
Step-by-step explanation:
Twenty-seven is smaller than five times a number increased by seven
Increase means add
27 < 5*n +7
Subtract 7 from each side
27-7 <5n+7-7
20 < 5n
Divide by 5
20/5 < 5n/5
4 <n
Y= 10 because you have a 180 degree angle split in half which equals 90 degrees so 3•30=90 the the other side has to equal 90 degrees so 2•30=60 then 3•10=30 so then just add 60 and 20 and there is your 90
if we look on one side, we already have one measurement. 4 cm. ok, that's the measurement on that side. look to the left now. that other side is also the same length, so we take that number and multiply it be 2 to get
Wait! we're not done yet. look at the top. do you see the 3? well that's the width for the top of the rectangle. the bottom must be the same to right? so we get
add both equations and you get
The answer is 14cm! Don't forget to label. ;)
It should be 376,656 ft^2 bc
1. square the bases (456 x 456 = 207936)
2. four triangles 4(1/2 x base x height) which would be 4(1/2 x 456 x 185) = 168720
then add up 168720 + 207936 = 376656
hope this helps :D
Answer:
What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
