What America's relationship would be with other countries around the world?

In Scramble for Africa, what enabled counties to take more land than others? (25 POINTS)

sasho [114]

The Scramble for Africa was the occupation, division, and colonization of African territory by European powers during the period of the New Imperialism, between 1881 and 1914. It is also called the Partition of Africa and the Conquest of Africa by some. In 1870, only 10 percent of Africa was under formal European control; by 1914 it had increased to almost 90 percent of the continent, with only Ethiopia (Abyssinia) and Liberia still being independent. With the Italian occupation of Ethiopia in 1936, only Liberia remained independent. There were multiple motivations including the quest for national prestige, tensions between pairs of European powers, religious missionary zeal[citation needed] and internal African native politics.The Berlin Conference of 1884, which regulated European colonisation and trade in Africa, is usually referred to as the ultimate point of the Scramble for Africa.[1] Consequent to the political and economic rivalries among the European empires in the last quarter of the 19th century, the partitioning, or splitting up of Africa was how the Europeans avoided warring amongst themselves over Africa.The later years of the 19th century saw the transition from "informal imperialism" by military influence and economic dominance, to direct rule, bringing about colonial imperialism.

4 0

3 years ago

Which beer do explains why state government are better able to focus on the needs of their citizens than the federal government

Nadusha1986 [10]

The reason why state governments are better in focusing on the needs of the citizens they are ruling over than the country's federal government due to the reason that the state governments oversee smaller geographical issues than the country's federal government wherein their full concern is the whole country, unlike state governments, who show their concern to each of the states they are ruling over.

6 0

4 years ago

How can society and new beliefs bring about reforms?

gregori [183]

<span>the Progressives differed in their assessment of the problems and how to resolve them, they generally shared in common the view that government at every level must be actively involved in these reforms</span>

5 0

3 years ago

HELP ME! ASSIGNMENT DUE SOON. PLEASE WRITE ME A PARAGRAPH ON WHY YOU WOULD/ WOULDN'T WANT TO LIVE IN ENGLAND AT 1066. PAPER IS T

alexira [117]

Answer:

Explanation:

I wouldnt want to go to England even though it is a beautiful, I am happy where i live. well here is the answer..

The young monarch was unable to resist the invaders and was never crowned. William was crowned King William I of England on Christmas Day 1066, in Westminster Abbey, and is today known as William the Conqueror.

Very different from today - that's for sure. There were far fewer people living in England, and large parts of the country were covered by woods.

There were no castles and not many stone buildings. Some churches and monasterial buildings were fashioned from stone, but most of the houses - even grand ones - were made from timber.

There were some large-ish towns - London, York, Winchester, Southampton, Canterbury - but mainly people lived in villages or on farms. There was trade, but many villages were still self-sufficient, only relying on the traders for luxury items.

Families stuck together, especially if they farmed land.

All free-born men could be called on to go to war when their overlord needed them. They had to bring their own weapons - shield, axe, spear, sword and any armour they could afford. Anglo-Saxon warriors usually fought on foot in a shield wall. Horses were only used as transport to get to the battle.

Most people would not have been able to read or write. Noble children, and those whose family engaged in trade, were taught reading, writing, maths and Latin. Some Anglo-Saxon nobles also learnt Norman French and travelled to the courts of Normandy.

England had a very efficient government. The country was divided into Hundreds, a little like today's counties. Leaders of each Hundred formed a council and met regularly to discuss problems and issue fines for transgressions. There was one currency across all of England, and the king's officers collected taxes and kept records.

Compared to some other parts of Europe, England was a very well established, well-run, rich and prosperous country. No wonder William the Conqueror braved the English channel and a war to get his hands on it.

Hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

The authors of the Articles of Confederation wanted to provide a way for the

Virty [35]

B.) States disagreed on why they need to tax citizens. i'm not exactly sure but it should be right.

6 0

4 years ago