First you have to turn left mom, NO MOM TURN LEFT, okay now do you see that hole in the ground, yea , ok good now jump down it and come get me , i got tied up, okay thank you, OKAY STOP SIRI, STOP TEXTING MY MOM ALREADY SIRI, SIRRIIIIIIIIIII
Answer: the correct answer is $70000
Explanation: the fair value of the shares given plus the fair value of the contingent consideration is the total amount paid by the buyer which is (20000 shares * $10 price per share) = $200000+$10000= $210000.
The gain of the transaction is registered as the net fair value of the acquiree that is $350000-$70000= $280000 less the sum paid by the Acquirer that is $280000-$210000= $70000.
The $15000 in direct acquisition costs are registered as period expenses and not relevant for the calculation of the gain of the transaction.
Answer: b. Economies of Scope
Explanation:
Economies of Scope refers to a situation where a company is able to reduce the cost of producing two or more goods by combining their production thereby leading to savings in the production process.
Economies of Scope in effect points out that there are some goods that when produced in tandem with another, lead to a cost reduction which means that its savings is <em>based on variety</em>.
Goods that usually achieve Economies of Scope are goods that are compliments, produced by similar methods or use similar inputs for production.
Firm A merging with Firm B produced the 5 radios and batteries cheaper so the new company is experiencing Economies of Scope.
Answer:
C. Responsiveness of quantity demanded to a percentage change in income.
Explanation:
Income elasticity is defined as the responsiveness of the quantity of a good demanded by an individual as his income changes, all other factors being constant.
Mathematically it is calculated as percentage change in quantity demanded divided by percentage change in income.
Income elasticity is used to find out if a good is a necessity or a luxury good.
The demand for goods that are a necessity does not change with a change in income.
However demand for a luxury good increases as income increases and vice versa
Answer:
Option 1 and 2
Explanation:
Complete Question
Which scenarios can be considered effects of Sole Sister Shoe Store choosing to sell dress shoes over sneakers?
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.
-
High school athletes stop shopping there.
-
The inventory of sports socks goes unsold.
-
Publicity for the store declines.
-
Profits decline because dress shoes cost less than sneakers
Solution
Sole Sister Shoe Store chooses to sell dress shoes over sneakers because the customers of sneakers stopped shopping from the store. Sneakers are mainly purchased by the high school athletes over any other footwear. Now, they stopped shopping and hence Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes
Also, sports socks' inventory is unsold indicating the reduction in sale of sneakers and hence the Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes
