Answer:
e) $37.05
Explanation:
Using the dividend growth model, the value of a stock is the present value of the future dividends receivable discounted at the required rate of return . The required rate of return is given as 12%.
So we discount the year 3 dividend using the dividend growth model formula
P = D (1+g)/r-g
r- rate of return, g = growth rate
Present value of the future dividends:
PV of Year 1 = 1.55(1.015)m × 1.12^(-1)
= 1.4047
PV of Year 2 = 1.55 (1.015)(1.015) × 1.12^(-2)
= 1.27
PV of Year 3 (this will be done in two steps)
Step 1; PV (in yr 2) of year 3 dividend
= (1.55)(1.015)^2×(1.08)/(0.12-0.08)
=43.114
Step 2 : PV (in yr 2) of year 3 dividend
=43.114 × (1.12^(-2))
= 34.37
Best estimate of stock = 1.40 + 1.27 +34.37
= $37.05
Note
To discount the year 3 dividend, we use two steps. The first stp helps get the PV in year 2, and step 3 helps to take it further to the PV in year 0
Answer:
-9.92%
Explanation:
P₀ = Div₁ / (Re - g)
- Div₁ = next year's expected dividend = $1.12 x (1 - 11.5%) = $0.9912
- Re = cost of equity = ?
- P₀ = current stock price = $62.91
- g = dividend's growth rate = -11.5%
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Re = ($0.9912 / $62.91) - 11.5%
Re = 1.58% - 11.5% = -9.92%
Since the cost of equity or required rate of return cannot be negative, I suppose that investors are not worried about Abbott distributing dividends, instead, they prefer that the company reinvests earnings in new projects.
Answer:
$119,176.06
Explanation:
Calculation for How much would you need to invest in B today
First step is to calculate the Future value of annuity (FVA)
FVA =$2,500 * ({[1 + (.115 / 12)](5 × 12) - 1} / (.115 / 12))
FVA = $201,462.23
Since we have known the FVA Second Step will be to calculate the Present value (PV)
PV = $201,462.23 × e-1 × .105 × 5
PV= $119,176.06
Therefore the amount that you would need to invest in B today will be $119,176.06
Answer:
The correct answer is: whenever they over- or under-allocate resources to a project.
Explanation:
A government is considered to be wasteful by the economists if it over-allocates or under-allocates resources on a project. Whenever resources are not efficiently or optimally allocated it is considered wasteful.
In case resources are over-allocated, the reason is given that the excess resources could have been used somewhere else.
In case resources are under-allocated, the reason is given that the given resources will not be able to provide the desired output.
