Answer:
D. all of these options
Explanation:
During the preconventional level of moral development , humans take developed our moral standard based on what the authority figures told us to. This tend to happen during our childhood, when our parents basically the one that determine what we should consider as right and wrong. (they will punish us if we behave in a way that they do not like)
This what make our moral judgement become self-centered. Since we only believe what our parents told us as absolute truth, we refuse the moral standard that is held by other people who were taught differently. But the truth is more complicated that that. Society's rule making process tend to be influenced by different cultures, religion , and personal experience that might vary between each individuals.
Quantity demand is the demand for goods in a considerable amount or size....
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
