Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
Europe needed to rebuild its economy after the war.
Answer:
Option B I guess
Explanation:
If it correct give me brainliest
Projective tests are based on the assumption that the ambiguous nature of the stimulus allows individuals to interpret it based on their feelings, desires, needs, and attitudes.
<h3>How is personality measured using projective tests?</h3>
When taking a projective test, you answer questions about ambiguous situations, language, or visual cues. With the expectation that these issues can then be addressed through psychotherapy or other suitable treatments, the purpose of such exams is to reveal the hidden conflicts or emotions that you project onto the test.
People are sometimes asked to provide the first response that comes to mind after being presented with an ambiguous visual in projective tests. The stimuli's ambiguity is what makes projective tests so effective.
These tests are based on the hypothesis that questions with precise definitions can lead to replies that have been deliberately designed by the conscious mind. It takes time to spend intentionally developing an answer when you are asked a simple inquiry regarding a certain subject.
Regardless of whether you're intending to mislead the test provider, this can create biases and even untruths.
It is hoped that this will make them less tempted to fake good or enhance their appearance.
Learn more about Projective tests here:
brainly.com/question/10379868
#SPJ4
