Answer:
(Assuming you want your answer in radians)
If you want the answer in degrees just multiply your answer in radians by 
giving you:
.
We can do this since 
(half the circumference of the unit circle is equivalent to 180 degree rotation).
Step-by-step explanation:
is going to output an angle measurement in ![[0,\pi]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B0%2C%5Cpi%5D)
.
So we are looking to solve the following equation in that interval:
.
This happens in the second quadrant on the given interval.
The solution to the equation is .
So we are saying that 
implies 
since ![\frac{3\pi}{4} \in [0,\pi]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B3%5Cpi%7D%7B4%7D%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%5Cpi%5D)
.
Answer is .
Answer:
y = c/b - (A x)/b
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve for y:
A x + b y = c
Hint: | Isolate terms with y to the left hand side.
Subtract A x from both sides:
b y = c - A x
Hint: | Solve for y.
Divide both sides by b:
Answer: y = c/b - (A x)/b
Answer:
a = (v – u)/t
Step-by-step explanation:
We know,
v = u+ at
v-u=at
(v-u) /t=a
Every whole number<span> is a </span>rational number: for example, 3=31. ... Everywhole number<span> n can be written as a fraction of integers: n=n1. We aren't required to write it that way; we just need to know that it is possible to express every </span>whole number<span> as a fraction of integers, and hence it is </span>rational<span>.
So I Believe the Correct Answer would Be D)</span><span> If a number is not a rational number, then it is not a whole number. The converse is true</span>
