Darshan is the Hindu tradition in which Madhuri is participating.
<h3>What are Hindu cultural traditions?</h3>
Hindus hold to the concepts of karma and samsara, or the eternal cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (the universal law of cause and effect). Hinduism places a high value on the concept of "atman," or the existence of a soul. According to this school of thought, every living thing is a part of the supreme soul and has a soul of its own.
For Hindus, achieving the four Purusharthas—ultimate life's goals—is what makes life worthwhile. Dharma, kama, artha, and moksha are these. These give Hindus the chance to live moral and ethical lives and act in moral ways.
In Indian philosophy and religion, notably in Hinduism, darshan (Sanskrit: "viewing"), often spelled Darshana, refers to the beholding of a deity (especially in image form), revered person, or sacred item. The relationship is regarded as reciprocal.
To know more about Hindu culture refer to: brainly.com/question/9555224
#SPJ4
Higher education inequalities should be addressed to improve the standard of living of South Africa by addressing the skill gap and performing more outreaches and researches.
<h3>What is Education inequality?</h3>
This is defined as the unequal distribution of resources and manpower which are required for the execution of different types of educational programs which should be addressed by the government in finding the required tactics to ensure a balanced system.
The best way to address this defect in the South Africa educational system is by addressing the skill gap and ensuring it is the same both in the rural and urban areas. This should be done by using the same types of funds and training so as to bring about a uniform feature and exposure needed for the improvement.
Read more about Education inequality here brainly.com/question/8994562
#SPJ1
Answer:
The institution and processes though which public policies are made of a society? Government, I believe
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
