Answer:
Answer is 32 i have no idea why
Answer: 24.52%
-------------------------------------------
Work Shown:
Convert the time 7:45, which represents 7 min 45 sec, to seconds only
7:45 = (7 min) + (45 sec)
7:45 = (7*60 sec) + (45 sec)
7:45 = (420 sec) + (45 sec)
7:45 = (420+45) sec
7:45 = 465 sec
Do the same for 5:51
5:51 = (5 min) + (51 sec)
5:51 = (5*60 sec) + (51 sec)
5:51 = (300 sec) + (51 sec)
5:51 = (300+51) sec
5:51 = 351 sec
So the initial time is 465 seconds and it drops to 351 seconds
Subtract the values to find the amount dropped: 465-351 = 114
Divide that difference over the initial time: 114/465 = 0.24516
Move the decimal over 2 spots to the right to convert to a percentage: 0.24516 --> 24.516%
Then round to the nearest hundredth of a percent (2 decimal places) to go from 24.516% to 24.52% which is our final answer
So the reduction is roughly 24.52%
This means if you took 24.52% of the initial time and subtracted it off, then you'd get to about 351 seconds.
To find the total increase, we will subtract -14 from 36.
36--14=50
(A double negative is a positive.)
50 is your final answer.
Answer:
100
Step-by-step explanation:
hehe
I am not certain of what you wrote for the function but will assume that is likely exponential function or quadratic function.
First, (quadratic function) To solve this, you must know the quadratic formula. The x-intercept is value(s) that has the output value(y) of 0.
If the vertex of the quadratic function of (0,0), there is only one x-intercept. The number and value of the x-intercept depends on the slope and vertical displacement.
Second, (exponential function) note that there is no x-intercept. For instance, if a is 2, is there such value y that 2^y is 0? The smallest exponential value that is an integer is 1. Even broadening the limit to rational numbers, no such exponential value can have the result of 0. Therefore, in the basic form of exponential function, there is no x-intercept.
