1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
2 years ago
9

In a federal system, the 50 state governments retain sovereignty, which prevents the federal government from interfering in the

financial matters of states. However, state governments can become involved in the fiscal matters of local governments, which is most recently evident in the state takeover of the city finances of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Detroit, Michigan. Why can state governments interfere in the fiscal matters of local governments but the federal government not interfere in the fiscal matters of state governments?
Social Studies
1 answer:
katovenus [111]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Local governments are not recognized by the U.S. Constitution.

Explanation:

Both the Bill of Rights of the Constitution and other parameters about how to conduct a government was originally aimed at the federal government's power. Local governments only exist due to the constitutions and laws of the state. For this reason, every action that local governments carry out must comply with the Consitution, just like those actions a state government performs.

You might be interested in
I NEED HELP ASAP!!
son4ous [18]

Answer:

4) peanuts

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
When considering the Heinz dilemma, Tony says that he would not steal the drug because his mommy told him that stealing was wron
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

first

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Who regulates markets where investments are traded?
Amiraneli [1.4K]
State tax board i think
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
44 A new justice has just been appointed to the Supreme Court
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

The function of The U.S Supreme Court as outlined in Article 3 of The U.S Constitution is to interpret federal laws.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
According to the Taylor rule, the Fed should: A. lower the fed funds rate by 2% if inflation rises 1% above its target of 1% B.
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

correct option is D raise the fed funds rate by 0.5% if inflation rises 1% above its target of 2%

Explanation:

solution

Taylor Rule is invented in 1992 and it is interest rate forecasting model

As the product of John Taylor Rule is the 3 number

  1. interest rate
  2. inflation rate
  3. GDP rate

and Taylor rule is that when GDP is equal to potential GDP and inflation rate is at its target rate of 2%

and the federal funds target rate should be 4%

so we can say here correct option is D raise the fed funds rate by 0.5% if inflation rises 1% above its target of 2%

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the scenario, what is the greatest economic challenge that country d is facing
    8·2 answers
  • Your sister breast-fed her daughter for 14 months and is now interested in weaning her child. It is obvious that your niece does
    12·1 answer
  • Twenty-eight-year-old melissa is a research psychologist. she is known for her creative research problem solving and the ability
    8·2 answers
  • Why do feral children act the way they do?
    12·2 answers
  • How long did the trail of tears last? And how did it start?
    6·1 answer
  • When a credit card is lost or stolen, the card holder's liability is limited to $100. Select one: True False
    9·1 answer
  • Which social media guideline defines what to do if you find a fabrication on a social media site?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did some Southern states withdraw from the united states in 1860?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following rivers makes up part of the US-Canadian border?
    10·2 answers
  • Plz help i will give brainliest ​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!