72p=76
p=76/72=1.056
Hope that helps
Answer:
hi
Step-by-step explanation:
Historical criticism tries to dig into the background of a context or event, Hence, it will most likely take cognizance of the following :
- <em>Major</em><em> </em><em>political</em><em> </em><em>events</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>occurred</em><em> </em><em>when</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>text</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>written</em><em> </em>
- <em>Beliefs</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>were</em><em> </em><em>common</em><em> </em><em>when</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>text</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>written</em><em> </em>
- <em>Original</em><em> </em><em>audience</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>text</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
In other to have a good grasp of the underlying facts and theories about a certain topic or context, it is important to have a good knowledge of the background into other not to misconceive the details and hence, give a constructive criticism.
- The original text ensures that one isn't taken information from a pirated or biased source.
- Cultural belief, values, political inclination and religion are some of the key factors which should be understood in other to grasp the principle or idea of a particular group or setting.
Therefore, political events, Belief and original text are key in performing historical criticism.
Learn more :brainly.com/question/24880439