What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to pro
ve it. B. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. C. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it. I know it is definetly not b and c because they both had that in common
The main difference between Darwin and Lamarck was that "<span>D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it" although this is a lot like answer C...</span>
Salt from the roadways can harm organisms such as plants by putting them in a hypertonic environment. Salt attracts water because it is a solute and can dehydrate the plants
