Answer:
a. She includes them at the same time as presenting complex charts to inject serious note.
Explanation:
In the first sentence it is stated that "Zikala-Sa often uses jokes to start her presentations or to keep her audience engaged while presenting figures." Then the figures may be related with charts, in this way she can present complex charts and associated them with a feeling so that they retain the information in an easier way and don't get bored, so in this way people are attentive and get the information.
Emily's answer constitutes a<u> "hypothesis".</u>
A hypothesis, in a scientific context, is a testable proclamation about the connection between at least two factors or a proposed clarification for some watched marvel. In a scientific experiment or study, the theory is a concise summation of the scientist's forecast of the examination's discoveries, which might be bolstered or not by the result. Hypothesis is the center of the logical strategy.
I'm pretty sure it's False I think
Additionally, increased candy consumption may alter the neurochemical activity of the brain, which could erode our ability to inhibit ourselves.
The brain may contract or atrophy as a result. Additionally, it may result in small-vessel disease, which reduces blood supply to the brain, impairing cognition and, in extreme cases, triggering the onset of vascular dementia. The mesolimbic dopamine system, which is the brain's reward system, is stimulated when we consume sweet foods. Dopamine is a substance in the brain that neurons produce that can indicate whether an event was favorable. As the brain adjusts to high sugar levels, sugar can also interfere with dopamine levels. In fact, taking excessive amounts of sugar over an extended period of time can affect both the gene expression and availability of dopamine receptors in specific regions of the brain.
Learn more about inhibit ourselves visit: brainly.com/question/13632119
#SPJ4
