Answer:
$950
Step-by-step explanation:
26% less than the regular price = 74%
set up the dimensions as:
part/whole = part/whole
$703 goes in part 74% goes in part
703/? = 74%/100%
Then multiply 100 by 703
100 x 703 = 70300
Finally divided by 74
70300 divided by 74 = 950
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
The regular price = $950
703/950 = 74%/100%
Answer: The answer is ![\sqrt[4]{8}.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B8%7D.)
Step-by-step explanation: Given expression is
We are to find the radical form of the above expression, i.e., we need to write the expression in a form that involves n-th roots of a particular number.
For example, consider the below identity.
![a^\frac{c}{d}=\sqrt[d]{a^c}.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%5E%5Cfrac%7Bc%7D%7Bd%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5Bd%5D%7Ba%5Ec%7D.)
Using this result, we can solve the given problem as follows
![2^\frac{3}{4}=\sqrt[4]{2^3}=\sqrt[4]{8}.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%5E%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B8%7D.)
Thus, the required radical form is
Step-by-step explanation:
hjskkskwkwnqbqjaokqwhqkoqoqhwjqknqjww
Answer:
(c) A false negative (concluding the job candidate is not a drug user when he or she indeed is)
Step-by-step explanation:
First, we need to determine if it is possible for type II error to occur or not.
In analysis, type 2 error occurs when the stated null hypothesis is false.
The given null hypothesis here is "a job candidate is not a drug user" which indicates false. This means that option (e) cannot be the solution.
Having established that there is a possibility for an occurrence of type II error.
Next, is to determine the error.
Type II error implies false negative; hence, options (a), (b) and (d) cannot be the solution.
(c) is correct.
Answer:
36
Step-by-step explanation:
With no parenthesis
