Answer:
<em>Volume</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>sphere</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>36</em><em>π</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>or</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>113</em><em>.</em><em>097</em><em> </em><em>cubic</em><em> </em><em>centimetre</em><em>. </em>
Step-by-step explanation:

<em>HAVE A NICE DAY</em><em>!</em>
<em>THANKS FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY</em><em> </em><em>TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION</em><em>. </em>
Answer:
The score that cuts off the bottom 2.5% is 48.93.
Step-by-step explanation:
When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.
In a set with mean
and standard deviation
, the zscore of a measure X is given by:

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
In this question, we have that:

What is the score that cuts off the bottom 2.5%
This is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.025, so X when Z = -1.96.




The score that cuts off the bottom 2.5% is 48.93.
Answer:
The cost of one taco is $0.87 and the cost of one enchilada is $1.16
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the cost of tacos be X
and cost of enchiladas be y
So, by using given data, we have following equations
3X + 2Y = 4.93 (1)
2X + 4Y = 6.38 (2)
So, first multiply 1st equation by 2 and 2nd equation by 3, then subtracting 1st equation by 2nd.
= 2 × ( 3X + 2Y = 4.93) (1)
= 3 × (2X + 4Y = 6.38) (2)
= - (6X + 4Y = 9.86) (1)
= 6X + 12y = 19.14 (2)
= 8Y = 9.28
Y = 9.28 ÷ 8 = 1.16
By putting the value of Y in equation 1, we get
3X + 2(1.16) = 4.93
3X + 2.32 = 4.93
X = 2.61 ÷ 3 = 0.87
Hence, the cost of one taco is $0.87 and the cost of one enchilada is $1.16.
In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
144 inches. 12 feet in one hour
12 inches per feet
12feet x 12 inches per foot= 144 inches