Answer:
B. Spearman
Explanation:
Charles Spearman was a psychologist who proposed a theory of intelligence. According to him, there's a general factor (the g factor) that can be defined as the overall mental capacity of a person and that it's shown when this person performs cognitive tasks.
According to him, there are no different types of intelligence but just a general factor that determines the "intelligence" of a person and, by determining the value of this factor we could determine one person mental capacities.
Unlike the other authors given in the option, he is the <u>only one</u> who thinks there's a <u>single factor behind intelligence measures </u>(Thurstone believed there were different mental abilities, Gardner proposed the theory of multiple intelligences and Sternberg thought that there were 3 types of intelligence)
Therefore, we can conclude that Spearman would have been the most enthusiastic about the value of a single intelligence test score as an index of an individual's mental capacities.
INTENT - 1st part was for why they were really wrting the declaraion in the first place, and the rights for individuals and the government purpose.
LIST OF GRIEVANCES - The unfair things that King George, For example, "taxation without representation". The refusal of good things the citizens did and soldiers could not live in the citizens home without consent.
DECLARATION - this meant that they were going to gain independance from Great Britain.
Answer:
Infants are born with approximately 300 bones, but as they grow some of these bones fuse together. ...
More than half of your bones are located in the hands, wrists, feet, and ankles.
Every second, your body produces 25 million new cells. ...
The largest bone in the human body is the femur, also known as the thigh bone.
Answer:
Population
Explanation:
House of Representatives represent a certain area of population. The congressional districts are divided and distributed by state and population.
The statement is "True".
It is normal, when tuning in to another person talk, to
figure an answer while the other individual is as yet talking. This implies the
individual is not by any stretch of the imagination tuning in to all that is
being said. Even good audience members are regularly blameworthy of
fundamentally assessing what is being said before completely understanding the
message that the speaker is attempting to convey. The outcome is that
suspicions are made and conclusions came to about the speaker's implying that
may be incorrect.
