Answer:
No, certainly it does not represent a security risk when someone is covering the face in public. It can have different implications. For example, if women is covering her face in public, it could be due to her own choice regarding the religious paradigm. It depends entirely on her how she is interpreting the religion and what she thinks best for her. It can also happen that sometimes covering of the face might be to hide her identity from the public. But if man is covering his face in public, it could be due to save his face from the dust, weather conditions etc but definitely not for the religious sake. In some cases, if man is covering his face, as we see in the movies, it could be for some security risk perspective.
By how people where treated (I think)
The correct answer is this one: "judicial system that uses judges for the most serious crimes." Among many things some of the more important concepts borrowed by the USA from ancient Greece and ancient Rome were the rights of citizens to vote; to have people accused of a crime be entitled to a jury trial.
The answer to this
question is:
“Tea Party Members”
What this group did was
to not look for third party candidate in elections. This is a clever tactic given
the history of defeat for third parties. Instead they have focused their
efforts on key statewide races. <span> </span>
