There is no doubt in my mind that today, 30 years later, we still have Theory X managers. According with McGregor Theory X, managers tend to have a negative, pessimistic view of employees and display more coercive, autocratic leadership styles using external means of controls, such as threats and punishment.
<h3>
What do you understand by theory of x managers?</h3>
Theory X managers frequently have a gloomy outlook on their workforce, assuming that they are naturally disengaged and disliking of their jobs. People are frequently motivated using a "carrot and stick" strategy, which can lead to repetitious work in firms run in this way.
Douglas McGregor developed the theories known as Theory X and Theory Y in 1960. These theories propose two aspects of human behavior at work, or, to put it another way, two opposing perspectives on people (employees): one is negative and is known as Theory X, and the other is positive and is known as Theory Y.
To learn more about theory of x managers, Visit: brainly.com/question/13187309
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Answer is C, if I'm correct.
Answer:
The three primary stakeholders are the banks, the merchants, and the consumers.
Banks = Against, since this would mean that they will be receiving less
Merchants = For, since they would be paying less
Consumers = Generally unaffected. But I believe they would be more against the proposal because if interchange fees are capped, then the banks will find other ways to retrieve the lost revenues by other means, such as increasing the interest or etc.
Jobs are the key to economic progress in the sense that an economic progress is not possible without jobs in the economy.
Jobs are also necessary to achieve high income levels - generally no income is possible without jobs.
So the statement is correct, but keep in mind that it's necessary condition, not sufficient condition!
