1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
victus00 [196]
3 years ago
14

I want to play a game, This isn't any ordinary game, ____________________. ____________. How much blood will you shed to save on

es life?
Law
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

depends on who it is if it was someone i knew id give all but if it was someone off the street id give as much as i could without dying

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Persons riding mopeds have the same rights and duties as drivers of motor vehicles. Moped
vivado [14]

Answer:

Persons riding mopeds have the same rights and duties as drivers of motor vehicles. Moped operators. A: Must only ride on roadways, bicycle paths, and foot paths

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Explain Why do we need to overhaul and <br> simplify the law
zlopas [31]

Answer:  When the law is so vast that it cant be understood by the one supposedly breaking the law, the person can be found guilty of a crime based on the interpretation as others see the law which might conflict someone elses interpretation.

Explanation:  We all have a right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness but how can you restrict that by writing more laws that contradict this right?

7 0
3 years ago
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
Who are the decision makers for the private sector in the U.S economy?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Individuals and businesses are owners and decision makers for the private sector. Government is owner and decision maker for the public sector.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following adjectives BEST describes an effectual, and true
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

Constitutionalism is a political movement and philosophy that states that the ruling power is bound to respect certain rights of its subjects. According to modern constitutionalism, the form of government must be based on a constitution.  

Constitutionalism includes both the empowerment and the limitation of power, both granting power and specifying its scope and purpose. Constitutionalism is considered to promote the principles of the rule of law, the principle of predictability, and to prevent arbitrary administration of justice. According to constitutionalism, laws and judgments in countries with common law can be declared invalid because they are contrary to the constitution if it is done in accordance with the principle of transparency, usually by a constitutional court or a court with similar jurisdiction.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor t
    13·1 answer
  • Puppy Woes. Sam promised to sell Linda a Welsh Corgi puppy for $300 but backed out of the deal. Linda sued Sam in state court fo
    9·1 answer
  • What toy that belongs to Scout does Jem use to destroy Miss Dubose’s camellia flowers?​
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes the role citizens play in a democracy
    14·1 answer
  • Joshua is at rank E2 in the Marine Corps. Which of the given statements is true for him? A. He belongs to a junior enlisted rank
    15·1 answer
  • During the _____ Era, concerned citizens tried to reform society and make drug makers accountable to consumers.
    5·1 answer
  • The press is free to say whatever they want about whomever they want, regardless of whether they know it’s true.
    13·2 answers
  • What are the safety steps to follow when changing lane?
    14·1 answer
  • Lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and le
    5·1 answer
  • What is NOT a way to lower your risk of drowsy driving?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!