<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the proper response is that they try to buy out competitors with cash. </span>
A they gave the federal government too much power and left little to none for the states.
A) there should be a monarch instead of a president
Answer:
a. Missouri Compromise.
Explanation:
The US government passed an agreement called the Missouri Compromise in 1820 that allowed Missouri to be a slave state. This agreement made a sectional demarcation by allowing the state of Missouri to be a slave state while making Maine a free state and also the areas north of Missouri to be also free soil.
As the issue of slavery was a burning issue for the Union, this compromise led to a backlash from the people. So, the people expressed their criticism of the 'representatives' or members of the Congress who helped in passing the controversial agreement.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
1. rugby was now governed by a non-racial body, perceptions of the game did not change over night. Black South Africans still viewed the Springbok as a symbol of apartheid. Afrikaners still viewed it as a symbol of their racial superiority. And I think this mite be it for number 3 , but not to sure He saw an opportunity with the South African (Springboks) rugby team as the way to unite one of the most divided countries towards a common goal. Shortly after becoming president, Mandela invited Francois Pienaar (Springbok captain) to his office. ... “One Team, One Country” became the slogan for South Africa Rugby team. Try to make it into your own words just for copied right, but if not that’s ok
