The potential risks that these three groups fall into the same category is that it is a low percentage and it is not a realistic proposition.
According to the theory of 50, 20, 30, a person's salary should be divided into 3 buckets that are:
- 50% of salary must go towards mandatory expenses (housing rent payments, utilities, medical care, basic food, and transportation).
- 20% of the salary must be used for savings and debt payments (programmed savings for old age or a special event, or the payment of debts such as card payments, bank loans, among others).
- 30% of the salary must be allocated for non-priority expenses (it is the expenditure of money on experiences, objects, or others that are not essential for the individual).
This income distribution is unrealistic because most people spend more than 50% of their salary on compulsory expenses, reducing their economic capacity for other purposes.
In this way, the 20% destined to savings and payment of debts would be a minimum amount of the salary, which could have serious consequences such as:
- Inability to pay debts
- Inability to save for the future
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12198015
If a bank reconciliation included a deposit in transit of $765 the company's journal entry for this reconciling item would contain nothing because the deposit has already been tracked and recorded. The complete question can be seen in attachment.
Bank reconciliation can be described as the process of comparing data on cash books with the corresponding data on the bank statements. It is a important process for the CFO's office and ensures the accuracy of accounting records. Reconciliation also says the process of matching transactions that have been recorded internally against monthly statements from external sources such as banks to see if there are differences in the records and to correct any discrepancies.
Learn more about Bank reconciliation at brainly.com/question/15525383
#SPJ4
<span>Business incubators are a time honored tradition and have been around since the early 1700s.
</span>
Ans: its true
Answer:
The appropriate approach is "Principal-agent problems".
Explanation:
- A contradiction of objectives or priority between someone individual or organization as well as the authorized accompanying documents to operate over its behalf is considered as Principal-agent problem.
- The possession of a commodity or fundamental assigns immediate supervision of that resource to some other agency may transpire in whatsoever circumstance.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the exception of the answers provided are seasonal cash requirements. This refers to the amount of cash you or the company needs to pay for unique expenses during a specific season. Which is not a factor when deciding what should be invested in marketable securities.
