The word secure is a protected sounding word so it’s the process of securing something from a business to protecting something from terrorist BASICALLY protecting♂️
Given that <span>the U.S. dollar exchange rate increased from $0.96 Canadian in June 2011 to $1.03 Canadian in June 2012, and it
decreased from 81 Japanese Yen in June 2011 to 78 Japanese Yen in June 2012.
Between June
2011 and June 2012, the U.S. dollar appreciated against
the Canadian dollar.
Between June 2011 and June 2012,
the U.S. dollar depreciated against the Japanese Yen.</span>
Imports of goods and services are items that households, firms, and governments <span>in the United States buy from the rest of the world.
Correct answer: B
Import is part of international trade</span><span>s, which denotes the change in ownership of material resources and services between one economy and another.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Martinez Company
Ending inventory is:
= $8,806.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Product Units Cost per Unit Market per Unit
Helmets 27 $ 55 $ 59
Bats 20 83 77
Shoes 41 100 96
Uniforms 45 41 41
Lower of cost or market value Valuation:
Product Units Cost per Unit Market per Unit LCM
Helmets 27 $ 55 $ 59 $1,485
Bats 20 83 77 1,540
Shoes 41 100 96 3,936
Uniforms 45 41 41 1,845
Total cost of ending inventory $8,806
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.