Answer:
B. an actual eviction
Explanation:
Actual eviction -
It refers to the process of getting rid of the tenant by the landlord, for any violation, is referred to as actual eviction.
It is a completely legal practice, where it the landlord is not not comfortable with the tenant or if the tenant violates any rules, then the landlord has the legal right to remove the person.
Hence, from the given question,
As the tenant usually disturbs the neighbors and argues, hence the landlady, Mrs, Larkin has the right to remove them, according to actual eviction.
Answer:
C. Ignoring shareholders' rights
Explanation:
Corporate governance refers to the way corporate companies are controlled and directed. The board of directors provides corporate governance in a company. Good corporate governance establishes a framework that protects shareholders' rights in the company.
Some of the shareholders' rights include
1. Right to vote
2. Right to transfer ownership
3. Right to dividends
4. Right to inspect corporate documents
The board of directors must ensure fair treatment of all shareholders, including the minority. The board has to put in place mechanisms that address shareholders' concerns and offers redress when their rights are violated.
Answer:
e. other insurance clause.
Explanation:
The other insurance clause is found in both property and liability insurance. This clause determines how loss is divided up when multiple policies cover the same loss.
Answer:
b.advertising
Explanation:
Market segment is a strategy that a organisation decides which market to appease.
Market Segments can be drawn from sales territories , groups of customers. and products but not advertising
Answer:
B) rent seeking behavior
Explanation:
Rent seeking behavior refers to actions carried out by businesses that try to seek benefits through government policies. In other words, the businesses will try to make the government give them some type of special treatment or special benefit at the expense of the general population.
In this case, the American winemakers were able to convince government officials to only serve domestic wine at government events. The problem is that the general population (taxpayers) are the ones that pay for that wine. American winemakers will benefit at the expense of the taxpayers.
