Using the computer language in python to write a function code that personalized house signs
<h3>Writting the code in python:</h3>
<em>#Assign varibles</em>
<em>charge = 0.00</em>
<em>numChars = 8</em>
<em>color = "gold"</em>
<em>woodType = "oak"</em>
<em />
<em>#Checking for number of characters</em>
<em>if numChars > 5:</em>
<em>charge = 35 + (numChars-5)*4</em>
<em>elif numChars > 0:</em>
<em>charge = 35</em>
<em />
<em>#Checking wood type</em>
<em>if woodType == "oak":</em>
<em>charge += 20</em>
<em />
<em>#Checking for color</em>
<em>if color == "gold":</em>
<em>charge += 15</em>
<em />
<em>#Print output</em>
<em>print("The charge for this sign is $"+str(charge)+".")</em>
See more about python at brainly.com/question/13437928
#SPJ1
Answer:
Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next. So "Lines" cannot be compared to/with internet companies.
Explanation:
The Internet Industry is shaped by its unique framework outlining and its own rules between the companies within it, which offer a vast number of products and services and not always competing with each other compared with the traditional established industries competition lines that were developed from two parties or more aiming the same unshareable goal. These industries are stablishing the lines of competitions predicament which by all means can not be measured and applied using the same criteria for both of them.
The online industry is claiming for flexible, pliant lines of competition to be inforced to its specific logic and mechanisms.
The companies are now in a brand new competing ground with the digital area, so traditional established bart lines of competition although clear and defined are becoming obsolete facing the current surprising thus blurred and indistict internet industry lines.
Answer:
Option B is the correct answer for the following question.
Explanation:
The following option is true because the pearsonr from scipy module is the method of the Python Programming Language in the submodule i.e., "scipy.stats" which print or return P-value for operating the hypothesis test for the value of correlation coefficient. So, that's why the following option is correct.
An option which isn't a valid technique to create a function stub is to: D. leave the function body empty.
<h3>What is a
function stub?</h3>
A function stub can be defined as a type of function that can be called safely without an error. However, a function stub has no definition because it doesn't actually perform any action when called.
In this context, leaving the function body empty is an option which isn't a valid technique to create a function stub.
Read more on function stub here: brainly.com/question/17214711
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is going to be system