Answer:
!!4
Step-by-step explanation:
according to my calculation it is 114
2.857 m away from the wall. because if it is 1.3 m off the ground when fired then you just subtract that from 2.9 to get 1.6 then divide that by sin (38.2) to get 2.857 m from the wall.
A) This is a repeating decimal which means it is possible to write it in the form p/q where p & q are integers and q is nonzero. So we can rule out choice A.
B) Similar to the answer choice above, we have another repeating decimal. So we can rule out choice B.
C) This is a terminating decimal. It does not go on forever. We can write this as a fraction (0.7 = 7/10). So we can rule out choice C.
D) This is also terminating so it seems like your teacher made a typo. What I'm thinking is that the 3.14 was meant to be a decimal that goes on forever without a pattern. This is a well known number called pi. I'm assuming that's what your teacher was going for.
So I'd go with choice D as the answer.
You need at least 2 congruent angles , or 3 proportional sides , or 2 proportional sides and 1 congruent angle to prove that 2 triangles are similar.
I presume that there should be a picture attached to this question , but if you only have 1 side in proportion ( x ) , you cannot prove the similarity of two triangles.
But if there already were two proportional sides or 1 proportional side and one congruent angle , you can prove they are similar if x = 48
Hope it helps
Answer:
<u>maximum of 2 bicycle</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the average cost per bicycle modeled by the equation
C(x) = 0.5x^2-1.5x+4.83
C(x) is in hundreds of dollars
x is number of bicycle
The number of bicycle that will minimize the cost occurs when dC/dx = 0
dC/dx = 2(0.5)x - 1.5
dC/dx = x - 1.5
Since dC/dx = 0
0 = x - 1.5
x = 0+1.5x = 1.5
Hence the shop should buy <u>maximum of 2 bicycle</u> to minimize the cost