All categories

3 years ago

1,13, 19.. Arithmetic, geometric, or neither

Mathematics

1 answer:

rosijanka [135]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Neither.

Step-by-step explanation:

13 - 1 = 12 and 19 - 13 = 6 - no common difference so its not Arithmetic.

13/1 = 13 and 19/13 = 1.46 - no common ratio so its not Geometric.

You might be interested in

If you are good at determining sequences please help! (Show work)

ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

-62.5008

Step-by-step explanation:

the pattern here is dividing by -5, so just continue dividing by -5 starting on -3 and continuing 4 more times. record each number and then add them together using a calculator. you will get -62.5008

Please mark brainliest :)

8 0

3 years ago

What is half of 31 over 50

____ [38]

31 divided by 50 is 0.62

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Himalayas in Asia are the tallest mountains in the world. PLEASE HELP ME

Tanya [424]

Answer: the answer is d trust me

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which would be appropriate compatible numbers to use to estimate ( 19 4 5 ) ( 4 6 ) ? Using this compatible number, what is the

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

The appropriate compatible numbers to use to estimate would be 20(1/2)

estimated product is 10, took the quiz :)

8 0

3 years ago

Which series of transformations will not map figure H onto itself

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a square with vertices at points (2,1), (1,2), (2,3) and (3,2).

Consider option A.

1st transformation $(x+0,y-2)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,-1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (1,0);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,0).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = 1 has the rule (x,2-y). So,

$(2,-1)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(1,0)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,0)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option B.

1st transformation $(x+2,y-0)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (4,1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (5,2).$

2nd transformation = reflection over x = 3 has the rule (6-x,y). So,

$(4,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,3)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,2)\rightarrow (1,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option C.

1st transformation $(x+3,y+3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (5,4);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (4,5);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (5,6);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (6,5).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 7 will map vertices into points

$(5,4)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,5)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,6)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(6,5)\rightarrow (2,1)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option D.

1st transformation $(x-3,y-3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (-1,-2);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (-2,-1);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (-1,0);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (0,-1).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 2 will map vertices into points

$(-1,-2)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(-2,-1)\rightarrow (3,4);$
$(-1,0)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(0,-1)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are not the vertices of the initial square.

5 0

3 years ago