Answer:
having a successful future
B. The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.
In Schneck v. the United States (1919), the Court's resolution supported the limitation of symbolic speech in the form of anti-war brochures which inspired residents to resist the draft. In two following cases, Thornhill v. Alabama (1940) and Virginia v. Barnette (1943), the Court ordered in favor of First Amendment security for symbolic speech. By favouring the students, the Supreme Court guaranteed that the students had the right to free speech inside schools as long as it did not disturb the education process.
Answer: True
Explanation:
The discretionary power vested upon an authority (public) is to be exercised by them (public) without being influenced by the will the superior authority (Department of Transportation). By allowing the populace make comments as regards the make up of rules and regulations in the establishment of an automated transport system, the department of transportation has delegated law making to the citizenry.
Answer:
Yes, it is justified.
Explanation:
The Mobile Phone market is one of the larges markets that exist, with Smartphone shipments worldwide adding up to around 1.6 billion units in 2019. Therefore even though creating mobile phone applications are costly and time consuming, the size of the market alone justifies this implementation because it will allow their product to land in the hands of all those people within that market. This in term leads to a significant increase on their Return on Investment (ROI).
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Penny and Lincoln Memorial
Explanation:
