A person must be a natural born citizen of the United States, must be at or over the age of 35, and must attend at least 14 years of residency in the U.S.
Answer:
The correct option is C: Grayson-Himes Pay for Performance Act
Explanation:
The bill was passed in 2009 was aimed at prohibiting some compensation to employees at some organization that were under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. This was done to help these financial institutions. It was an amendment to the executive compensation provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Answer:
Exception
Explanation:
An exception report is the type of document which states that particular instances in which the actual performance is deviated significantly from the expectations and is deviated usually in the negative direction. Intent of this report is to focus the management attention on these areas and thus requiring immediate action to deal.
<u>Thus, the kind of the report that allows Yuli to focus on the stores is Exception report.</u>
I believe the answer is: polygyny
polygyny refers to a form of poligamy in which one male have more than one female partner/mates.
From all forms of poligamy, polygyny is the most common to be found in the world, especially in middle eastern countries.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
