Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. H0: μ ≤ 104 Ha: μ > 104
Assuming the data leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, we would conclude that there is no sufficient statistical evidence to prove that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month.
b. The type error in this situation would be rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it was actually true.
c. Type II error in this case would be failing to reject the null when it is false. Failing to reject the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it is actually not true.
The consequences for these errors might be disastrous including sueing of the accuser party etc.
Step-by-step explanation:
50(4+6)=500
hope it helps you get
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey! I cant draw the shape in the answer box. Sowiee
We have that
smaller figure
ha=8.7
ra=1.6
larger figure
hb=10.44
rb=1.92
ha/hb=8.7/10.44----> 0.83
ra/rb=1.6/1.92-------> 0.83
ratio smaller figure to the larger figure
1.6/1.92-------> divided by 1.6 both members[1.6/1.6]/[1.92/1.6]-------> 1/1.2
the ratio ha/hb is equal to the ratio ra/rb
so
the smaller figure and the larger figure are similar
and
the ratio smaller figure to the larger figure is equal to----> 1/1.2
the answer is
the option yes 1/1.2
Answer:
785 almonds
Step-by-step explanation:
157 x 5 = 785