Can anyone please help I really need it

Law

1 answer:

dybincka [34]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

i cant zoom in on picture

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?

KIM [24]

$\large{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\sf{\color{yellow}{Answer:}}}}}}$

No criminal crime should not be heard judges other than professional and paid judges because they have a lot of experience about these kinds of cases

5 0

3 years ago

The majority of a forensic scientist's time is spent

myrzilka [38]

A forensic scientist's day-to-day activities will vary throughout the week. The majority of their time is spent in the office writing reports and preparing for laboratory visits. Other days, however, they may be carrying out a laboratory visit or attending court as an expert witness (Brightside, 2003).

3 0

3 years ago

which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports

Fantom [35]

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.

I hope this helps! :)

3 0

2 years ago

__________ is a term used to describe the return of a former correctional client to criminal behavior as measured by new arrests

tino4ka555 [31]

Answer: recidivism

Explanation:

The return of a former correctional client to criminal behavior, as measured by new arrests or other problems with the law is known as recidivism.

Hope this helps!!! Good luck!!! ;)

5 0

3 years ago

In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni

german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0

3 years ago