Unlimited liability<span> refers to the legal obligations general partners and sole proprietors because they are </span>liable<span> for all business debts if the business can't pay its </span>liabilities<span>.</span>
Answer:
(a) Barton's investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Accounts receivables $44,900
($48,000 - $3,100)
Equipment $90,000
Allowances for uncollectible $1,300
Barton Capital $133,600
(To record Barton's contribution)
(b) Fallows' investment
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Cash $28,700
Merchandise Inventory $60,500
Fallow Capital $89,200
(To record Fallow's contribution)
Esmeralda's promise is not enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable.
A legally enforceable contract means that you can keep the promise of the other party. If the other party fails or refuses to meet its obligations, the contract can be fulfilled in accordance with the law.
A non-enforceable contract or transaction is valid but not enforced by the court. Unenforceable is typically used in conflict with void (or void ab initio) and voidable. If the parties implement the agreement, it is valid, otherwise, the court will not enforce them.
Learn more about legally enforceable here:brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
Answer: c. A nonagency relationship with everyone in the office.
Explanation:
For an agency relationship to exist in the eyes of the law, there must be a contract with a written designated agency relationship between the client and Meramac Realty.
With no such contract in existence, the law recognizes no agency relationship between Meramac and any of its affiliates with the client. There is therefore a non-agency relationship with everyone in Meramac.
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
France can produce four phones or three computers:
Opportunity cost of producing one phone = (3 ÷ 4)
= 0.75 computers
Opportunity cost of producing one computer = (4 ÷ 3)
= 1.33 phones
Sweden can produce one phone or two computers:
Opportunity cost of producing one phone = (2 ÷ 1)
= 2 computers
Opportunity cost of producing one computer = (1 ÷ 2)
= 0.5 phones
Therefore,
France has a comparative advantage in producing phones because of the lower opportunity cost of producing it than Sweden. France should specialize in producing phones and import computers from Sweden.
Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers because of the lower opportunity cost of producing it than France. Sweden should specialize in producing computers and import phones from France.
