Answer:
a)1400 + 300x ≤ 5000
b) x ≤ 12 days
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Since the grocery store owner wants to stay within budget then, this means he would be spending at most $5,000
The word at most is represented by the inequality sign ≤ = Less than or equal to
Let x = Number of days
Hence,
Our inequality equation is
$1400 + 300× x ≤ $5000
1400 + 300x ≤ 5000
b) Solving for x
1400 + 300x ≤ 5000
300x ≤ 5000 - 1400
300x ≤ 3600
x ≤ 3600/300
x ≤ 12 days
So hmm notice the picture below
you're simply being asked to, approximate the area, by using 4 rectangles, like in the graph, it doesn't have to be an exact value, just an approximation, based on the width and height of the rectangles, and getting their area by that
those rectangles are 0.39 radian long, since if you split π/2 in 4 pieces, you get around that much, the last rectangle there is a bit smaller than 0.39.... but they don't have to be 4 rectangles of equal length
so, get the area of the rectangles, based on their width and height, and sum them up
Answer:
Summary
Interest in the linguistics of humor is widespread and dates since classical times. Several theoretical models have been proposed to describe and explain the function of humor in language. The most widely adopted one, the semantic-script theory of humor, was presented by Victor Raskin, in 1985. Its expansion, to incorporate a broader gamut of information, is known as the General Theory of Verbal Humor. Other approaches are emerging, especially in cognitive and corpus linguistics. Within applied linguistics, the predominant approach is an analysis of conversation and discourse, with a focus on the disparate functions of humor in conversation. Speakers may use humor pro-socially, to build in-group solidarity, or anti-socially, to exclude and denigrate the targets of the humor. Most of the research has focused on how humor is co-constructed and used among friends, and how speakers support it. Increasingly, corpus-supported research is beginning to reshape the field, introducing quantitative concerns, as well as multimodal data and analyses. Overall, the linguistics of humor is a dynamic and rapidly changing field.Step-by-step explanation:
You can use c^2 = a^2 + b^2 to solve for the length of the other leg. Just substitute the values to the variable then transpose to get the value of the missing variable.
Given: a = 13; c = 21
Required: b - other leg
Solution:
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
21^2 = 13^2 + b^2
441 = 169 + b^2
b^2 = 272
<span>√b = 16.49
b = 16.49 cm</span>
Here! I hope it helps you! 1/10•(-6x-5)
