1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
9

MULTIPLE CHOICE / Will Impact Other Homeschoolers / Brainliest

History
2 answers:
Pepsi [2]3 years ago
8 0
I honestly feel like the answer is A! Hope this helps! ;)
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:   A) The Black Death

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
During the Nullification Crisis of 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union because it disagreed with a federal
nlexa [21]

Simple Answer: Tariffs

A tariff is a tax (in this case) on imports. The South, particularly South Carolina, objected strongly to the high rate of taxation on goods she desparately needed. The rates did seem a little high -- 62% on 92% of the goods coming into South Carolina (and other southern states). For example if South Carolina want to import 1000 dollars worth of shovels, she would have to pay an additional 620 dollars to do it.

The acts of 1828 and 1832 were thought by the South to be ruinous because not only would she be forced to pay much more for basic needs, she would not be able to sell her cotton to Great Britain because of the way the tax was imposed.

Thus a very strong case was built for disobedience to the 1828 and 1832 acts.   What made those two acts a pain was that North was determined to force unity on a South that had other economic problems during the 1830s (like drought). So the nullification process meant that something had to be done or South Carolina was threatening to go to war to protect her economy.

Thus the Tariff act of 1833 was introduced, and though you have not asked anything about that, I think you should note that Act was intended to unruffle South Carolina's feathers.  It was a grand compromise devised by Andrew Jackson's administration. It succeeded until 1842 when it's tenure was up. You can read all of this by reading more about the Nullification Crisis. Be sure and read about Jackson's comments on it.  

So this rather complex turn of events all really hinged on money and standard's of living. The vocabulary used was States Rights Vs Federal Rights. Put in very simple language: who has more rights, the one or the many? It took a civil war some 30 years later to resolve that question.

6 0
3 years ago
Power is divided between the national government and state governments.<br> A Government ante ito
Crank

Answer: so the federal government can control the states like the president and can also declare war

the state government cant declare war but caan control the laws and activities in their state

8 0
3 years ago
according to the mayflower compact why did the colonist at plymouth need to form a civil body politic
patriot [66]
<span>The Mayflower Compact was an agreement signed by the male passengers of the Mayflower and which served as the foundational governing agreement of the Plymouth colony. The Compact said that it was necessary to form a 'civil body politic' so that the colonists could be 'better ordered', or organized, to accomplish their shared goal of establishing an English colony in North America, and so that they would have the basis for establishing whatever laws, ordinances and offices they found necessary for accomplishing that goal.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
If the Soviets had been true to Karl Marx’s theory of communism, what would they have done?Why did hardline communist leaders re
Dafna1 [17]

The Soviets were proclaiming themselves as communist, though the reality was not as the communism truly says a state should be run. If the Soviets practiced the textbook communism, then everyone in the society would have been equal. Everyone was going to earn the same amount of money and get the same things necessary for life without any problem. The economy would have been self-sustaining and that was going to be supported by excellent planning. There were not going to be social classes, but everyone would have been in the same class. The Soviets did pretty much everything wrong with those ideas, and in all fairness the human nature just doesn't allow for something like that to exist.

Mikhail Gorbachev was hated by the hardline communist. The main reason for that was that he was trying to make the country slightly more liberal, more open to the world and to modernization. That was seen as treason of the communist ideology by the hardline communist so they were against all of that.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these choices best represents the political philosophy Jefferson valued above all?
    15·2 answers
  • Three primary reasons for the decline of U. S. cities are suburbanization, disinvestment, and deindustrialization
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these would deter (slow down) inflation? a decrease in interest rates an increase in economic growth a decrease in the
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these places was the departure point for slaves from the mid-1500s to the mid-1800s?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Franklin Roosevelt pay for his new deal programs
    12·1 answer
  • How was the Roman Empire most affected by political corruption?
    12·2 answers
  • 9. Oberlin College was unusual because it admitted women and African Americans.
    12·1 answer
  • upang sundin ang rutang dinaanan ni vasco da gama sa timog ng africa ngunit nakakating siya ng brazil ​
    13·1 answer
  • -Most of the Indian Ocean is below the equator.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    10·1 answer
  • Whose administrative policies did the Ottoman's adopt after conquering Constantinople?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!