Even if they were unaware of the fraud, accountants may be held accountable for it.
<h3>How does constructive fraud work?</h3>
A legal fable known as "constructive fraud" describes a circumstance in which a person or organization obtained an unfair advantage over another using dishonest or unjust means. As opposed to true fraud, no proof of intent is required. The failure to inform clients of product flaws is one example of unfair practices.
The elements are:
1) a duty owed by the party to be charged to the complaining party due to their relationship;
2) violation of that duty by making deceptive material misrepresentations of past or current facts or remaining silent when a duty to speak exists; and
3) reliance on such statements by the complaining party.
To know more about fraud visit:
https://brainly.in/question/51948586
#SPJ4
Answer:
Second-degree price discrimination.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
- Second-degree price discrimination occurs when a company charges a different price for different quantities consumed, such as quantity discounts on bulk purchases.
- It involves pricing goods and services in such a way that it drums up demand and consumption.
- There are various degrees of this strategy, notably first-, second-, and third-degree price discrimination.
To learn more about second-degree price discrimination, refer
to brainly.com/question/1065123
#SPJ4
Answer:
$10,856
Explanation:
Price of the bond is the present value of all cash flows of the bond. These cash flows include the coupon payment and the maturity payment of the bond.
According to given data
Face value of the bond is $10,000
Coupon payment = C = $10,000 x 4.8% = $480 annually = $240 semiannually
Number of periods = n = 22 years x 2 = 44 period
YTM = 4.2% annually = 2.1% semiannually
Price of the bond is calculated by following formula:
Price of the Bond = C x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + r )^-n ) / r ] + [ F / ( 1 + r )^n ]
Price of the Bond = $240 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 2.1% )^-44 ) / 2.1% ] + [ $10,000 / ( 1 + 2.1% )^44 ]
Price of the Bond = $6,848.64 + $4007.4 = $10,856.04
Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
<u>A) private-sector entrepreneurs can expropriate the profits generated by the efforts of private and public entities.</u>
Explanation:
- As there exist four basic structures of the market economy in the form of perfect competition, imperfect competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.
- Thus without any legal system of trade in the market economy, the profits that are generated by the public and private sectors can be taken away by these entities as a large number of small firms tends to compete in the market against each other with there homogenous products.
- Thus under such circumstances, the market economy would deprive all the profits made by the other forms in the market and put barriers to entry for others. Buyers thus will be deprived of the quality products.
