1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
12

What's more dangerous, Lightning hitting water or just Lightning?

Social Studies
2 answers:
ziro4ka [17]3 years ago
5 0
I'd say that lighting hitting land would be more dangerous. If it hit water it would more than likely not affect anything besides a fish if it was within the vacinity. A lighting stroke on land though is more likely to hit a person than a lighting strike in water is to hit a person or a fish for that matter.

Hope this helps =)
vlada-n [284]3 years ago
3 0
Lighting hitting water. I can give an explanation if needed
You might be interested in
If approached on the street by a stranger and asked to make a guess about their iq score, your best guess would be:________
Sauron [17]

The correct answer is 100.

Since intelligence is regularly distributed with an average IQ of 100, and  we don't know anything about this stranger, our best bet would be to rely on the bell curve.

<h3>What is the relationship between the bell curve and intelligence testing?</h3>

Intelligence test results follow a bell curve. When employed in psychological testing, the bell curve depicts a normal distribution of a trait.

Standardized IQ tests are developed so that their scores in the general population follow a 'bell curve' distribution with an average of 100.

This curve has a peak where most individuals score in the middle and a taper where just a few people score at the ends. The majority of the scores are recorded during the "bell's" peak. The bell then slopes down to each side, with one side reflecting scores that are higher than average and the other side representing scores that are lower than normal.

To  know more about the Bell Curve, visit: brainly.com/question/1838638

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Which of the following statements is false? Using a cost-benefit analysis approach to your buying decisions will make you a wise
Alja [10]

Answer: Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment.

Explanation:

From the given options, we can state that the following statement is false i.e. Your choices as a consumer have no impact on the larger social environment. Our choices as a consumer tends to have a huge impact on our surroundings especially the larger social environment. Our choice affect the forces of supply and demand , and thus everything related to it.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Springfield Mutant Party believes in eliminating taxes on donuts, having garbage carriers get the garbage from inside your h
sergij07 [2.7K]

The correct answer is C because, A platform is an official statement of party policy. A plank are the specific issues that make up a platform, while a referendum when voters go to the polls to decide a specific issue, like the donut tax, for example.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact of globalization on georgia's imports and exports in recent decades?
Gnom [1K]
The break down of traditional boundaries in the face of increasingly global financial and cultural trends. 
3 0
3 years ago
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goo
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost

Explanation:

In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>

In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A suggested answer to a question is a
    6·1 answer
  • What is the most effective way for Congress to prevent a president's foreign policy?
    8·1 answer
  • When did the first humans cross into north and south america?
    15·1 answer
  • What is a constant I don't understand it
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following situations describes the use of reward power? Situation 1: Lindsay, member of a charitable organization,
    6·1 answer
  • How do citizens have power in a republic, or representative democracy?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement about the influence of individuals and/or groups of people in history is false?
    7·1 answer
  • In contrast to a developing country, a developed nation has
    8·1 answer
  • according to research, __________. group of answer choices detecting strangers' lies is fairly easy very few people are even min
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!