Answer:
The industrial Revolution begin in Great Britain during the mid-18th Century. Britain was the world's leading commercial nation controlling a global trading empire with colonies in the North America and the Caribbean. As a results of the Britain colonies in the North america, industrial revolution developed faster in the North American State compared to the South United States
Explanation:
The results of industrial revolution in the united States includes a shift from hand production methods to machines, new chemical manufacturing and iron production processes. Samuel Slater is known as the "Father of the American Industrial Revolution".
The purpose of these both steps is that it gives the candidates a realistic, sensible, and practical preview of the vacant job. In both steps, candidates of the hiring process should know the job expectation versus reality so they will not be surprised if their expectation doesn't meet.
Answer:
The economy of the Lower South—North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia—was based upon plantation agriculture in the eighteenth century. The Carolinas were settled in the 1660s but did not find a profitable export until the 1690s when rice was established as the staple crop.
I believe the answer is: <span>Müller-Lyer Illusion
The </span><span>Müller-Lyer illuison is consist of a set of three arrow-like figures, where the head of the second arrows would be drawn on the opposite direction than the first.
When the participants are asked to determine which arrows are longer after discounting the arrow-head, most people see the arrow with backwards head placement has the longer line even though the length of all arrow lines are the same.</span>
Answer:
Yes, it was. The US was, like the rest of the world, soldiering on towards the end of a dark period of human history that had seen the single most costly conflict (in terms of life) in history, and they chose to adopt a stance that seemed to limit the amount of casualties in the war, by significantly shortening it with the use of atomic weapons.
It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.
Explanation: