1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Savatey [412]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following is the best way to express the difference between indeterminate sentences and determinate sentences?

Law
1 answer:
notka56 [123]3 years ago
3 0
The I believe the answer is between A and B
You might be interested in
Is the illegal use of another author's material without permission or citation.
kari74 [83]

Answer:

D) plagiarism

Explanation:

Plagiarism is when you use someone else's work and say its your own. To avoid plagiarism, always cite where you found your research from and use quotations when quoting someone. If you need to use someone else's work then ask permission. If your making money off of someone else's work then you need to pay the person you copied from. Plagiarism can mean jail time and is considered a serious offense.

3 0
3 years ago
Who has the responsibility for agreement with the P&DP laws commitments?
Ksju [112]

Answer:Customers

Explanation:

The P&DP law is a data protection law. Data protection laws are privacy laws and regulations used in protection against the processing and disclosure of personal data or information.

Data protection laws were developed to control how customer information is being used by a government of a state of organization bodies. Partial Data protection laws and regulations exist in the United States of America.

Examples of federal laws in the United States of America which has the provisions that promote information flow efficiencies are; customer proprietry network information (CPNI), Health insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA),and so on.

HIPAA law was made to regulate use and disclosure of health information of citizens.

8 0
3 years ago
WHAT IS EMBZELEMENT?
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

Embezzlement is the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give five significances of human property
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

<h2>The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership) is often classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions. A general recognition of a right to private property is found more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for production rather than consumption.[1]</h2><h2 /><h2>A right to property is recognised in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[2] but it is not recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3] The European Convention on Human Rights, in Protocol 1, article 1, acknowledges a right for natural and legal persons to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions", subject to the "general interest or to secure the payment of taxes."</h2><h2 /><h2>Definition </h2><h2>Relationship to other rights </h2><h2>History </h2><h2>See also </h2><h2>Notes </h2><h2>References </h2>

<h2>External links</h2>

4 0
2 years ago
On 5 August, X sends a written offer by post to Y, to purchase Y’s ROLEX watch for R20000 (twenty thousand rand). One of the ter
notka56 [123]

Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.

This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.

<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>

This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.

Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.

Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.

Read more about contract here:

brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A few years ago, Bill became a victim of identity theft. Recently, Bill received a corrected credit clearance from Indent Credit
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the burden of proof in a criminal case?
    12·1 answer
  • What is a wrongful execution? Why can this happen
    15·1 answer
  • Prior to the Supreme Court case "Gideon v. Wainwright", why was Clarence Gideon in jail?
    8·2 answers
  • In the developing world, most women who achieve political office tend to have family ties to prominent
    6·1 answer
  • Which is direct evidence:
    11·2 answers
  • What organization contains the Women, Infants, and Children program?
    12·1 answer
  • 8.)
    5·1 answer
  • How do you drive with CARE?<br> Drivers ED
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!