1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
2 years ago
14

nemployment rates are A. lower for people without a high school degree than for college​ graduates, and vary greatly among ethni

c groups. B. lower for college graduates than for people without a high school​ degree, and vary greatly among ethnic groups. C. lower for college graduates than for people without a high school​ degree, and vary little among ethnic groups. D. lower for people without a high school degree than for college​ graduates, and vary little among ethnic groups.
Social Studies
2 answers:
SCORPION-xisa [38]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. lower for people without a high school degree than for college​ graduates, and vary greatly among ethnic groups.

Explanation:

                "Unemployment" is a term coined for people who do not have a job to earn for their living. Unemployment is highly related to the qualification and skill sets people have.

                It is seen that people who do not have a high school degree are less likely to get an employment  when compared to people who have a college graduation degree. And it varies greatly among the ethnic groups.

Unemployment rates are seen more for people who do not any have any particular skill set that is required to work. Also academic qualifications is also an important criteria for getting employed.

Thus the answer is

A. lower for people without a high school degree than for college​ graduates, and vary greatly among ethnic groups.

pogonyaev2 years ago
3 0

Answer: A. lower for people without a high school degree than for college​ graduates, and vary greatly among ethnic groups.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why was plant and animal domestication such a big deal?
gogolik [260]
With out domestication, we would not have the current plant a and animals today. It allowed for tools and food for settlers.
6 0
3 years ago
How did uneven distribution of wealth contribute to unrest in Latin American countries?
ad-work [718]
Uneven distribution of wealth contributed to unrest in Latin American countries as the resultant inequality resulted in the <span>growth of drug-related organised crime, as well as the </span>youth gangs<span> that offer alternative sources of livelihood to people. This can be destabilizing to the region.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What does President Jackson state is the best reason for the removal of Native Americans?
Kisachek [45]
President Andrew Jackson reason to remove the Native Americans because he wants the land for settlers to settle in and he didn't want the Native Americans to bother them and he anted the to leave but they wouldn't  buge so the law stated they had to be forced and walk to what is now present-day Oklahoma  Hope this helps:)
6 0
3 years ago
An experimental study has found that alcoholics who attend peer group meetings are more successful in reducing their consumption
Irina18 [472]
This suggestion reflects a concern with causal mechanisms. The Causal mechanism is the procedures or passageways over which an outcome is taken into being. There are two broad types of theories of causation which is the Humean theory which is causation as regularities and the causal-realist theory which is causation as a causal mechanism.  The Humean theory embraces that causation is completely established by facts about empirical regularities among noticeable variables in which there is no fundamental causal nature, causal power or causal necessity while the causal-realist takes concepts of causal mechanisms and causal powers as essential, and holds that the undertaking of scientific research is to attain at empirically defensible theories and hypotheses about those causal mechanisms.   
4 0
3 years ago
Explain wheter fighting a "common enemy" is a positive thing or negative​
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

Negative

Explanation:

Enemies usually refer to bad guys. So if it is a "common enemy" then it is a common bad guy that everyone knows about. It can also mean that you and someone else share an enemy, but that is stilll negative.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a bike race: julie came in ahead of roger. julie finished after james. david beat james but finished after sarah. in what pla
    13·1 answer
  • What meant by DMAT account?​
    13·1 answer
  • According to this quote, what motivates most individuals? desire for power concern for others competition for jobs sense of self
    9·2 answers
  • Tricare regions are served by one or more blank who assist tricare sponsors with health care needs and answer questions about th
    12·1 answer
  • The National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the U.S. economic recession that began in December of 2007 hit a trough
    8·1 answer
  • How does the narrator feel in the selection "Checkpoint" when they see the 1 point
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following African American activists published articles about lynching's?
    7·2 answers
  • Roger Williams is best known for his views on
    9·2 answers
  • What ethnic group became dominant in the Eastern Europe
    11·1 answer
  • Strong emotions __________ your ability to make thoughtful decisions or to reason. -block -enhance -interfere with
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!