Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
I can't entirely see the picture.
laws banning marriages between people of different races
apex
Answer:
A. Stated in broad terms to allow for flexibility
Explanation:
During the briefing, incident objectives will be presented to all the person involved as the main goal of the operation.
Flexibility<em><u> is allowed in finding methods /ways to achieve</u></em> the goals , BUT <u><em>flexibility cannot be allowed in determining the goal itself. \</em></u>
<em> </em>Stating the objectives in broad terms to allow flexibility only create the risk of confusion, which make team members have different ideas of what needed to be achieved.
To ensure that all the team members work harmoniously, objectives need to be Logically attainable, can be measured by a specific standard, include time frame that specify when the objectives needed to be done, and it also need to stay within the commander's jurisdiction.
