Remark
The proof is only true if m and n are equal. Make it more general.
m = 2k
n = 2v
m + n = 2k + 2v = 2(k + v).
k and v can be equal but many times they are not. From that simple equation you cannot do anything for sure but divide by 2.
There are 4 combinations
m is divisible by 4 and n is not. The result will not be divisible by 4.
m is not divisible by 4 but n is. The result will not be divisible by 4.
But are divisible by 4 then the sum will be as well. Here's the really odd result
If both are even and not divisible by 4 then their sum is divisible by 4
Trisha - 17 percent
Anchara - 4/25 = 0.16 = 16 percent
Juanita - 16 - 13.3 = 2.7 2.7/16 (since 16 is the total) = 0.16875 = 16.875 percent
So Trisha reduced her time by the greatest percent (17)
Answer:
10.82
Step-by-step explanation:
From the steps shown in the table given, we can conclude that: D. in solving the equation, the subtraction property of equality was not applied.
<h3>What is the Subtraction Property of Equality?</h3>
If a + b = c, to apply the subtraction property of equality so that b is moved to the other side of the equation, we would have:
a + b - b = c - b
a = c - b
Thus, from the table given, the none of the steps showed that the subtraction property of equality was applied in solving the equation, so, the answer is: D.
Learn more about the subtraction property of equality on:
brainly.com/question/1601404
#SPJ1