<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>
If an individual taxpayer's marginal tax rate is 32 percent and he holds the following assets for more than a year, which gains will be taxed at the lowest rate at the time of sale-----Gains from personal-use property.
What is meant by a marginal tax rate?
The marginal tax rate is the amount of additional tax paid for every additional dollar earned as income. The average tax rate is the total tax paid divided by total income earned.
Tax rate
In a tax system, the tax rate is the ratio at which a business or person is taxed. There are several methods used to present a tax rate: statutory, average, marginal, and effective. These rates can also be presented using different definitions applied to a tax base: inclusive and exclusive
Learn more about marginal tax rate:
brainly.com/question/23568955
#SPJ4
Answer:
$52,526
Explanation:
In two years i have $35,000.
the amount invested thus the Principle amount is $35,000
Pv = $35,000
r = 7 %
PMT = $0
n = 6
Fv = ?
Note that The 8 th year is the sixth year of this investment.
FV = PV × (1 + r) n
= $35,000 × ( 1 + 0.07) 6
= $52,525.56
= $52,526
Answer is Structural adjustment.
Structural adjustment is arrangements of progression; obliged nations to privatize state-run firms, end endowments, diminish duty boundaries, recoil size of state, welcome remote venture; answer for monetary problem of less created countries, state had excessively turn in market so the state ought to pull back, IMF took after the possibility that a littler state is better for the economy (less direction, unhindered commerce, diminished estimation of cash)
Answer:consumers
Explanation:
In a free-market system, consumers and producers have sovereignties that drive the market and decisions made to ensure that supply and demand
