The 3-act structure<span> is an old principle widely adhered to in storytelling today. It can be found in plays, poetry, novels, comic books, short stories, video games, and the movies. It was present in the novels of Conan Doyle, the plays of Shakespeare, the fables of Aesop, the poetry of Aristotle, and the films of Hitchcock. It’s older than Greek dramaturgy. Hollywood and Broadway use it well. It’s irrefutable and bullet-proof, so to speak.
so this means its more basic antagonist protagonist set-up even if the protagonist and antagonist are "CUBES"</span>
almost everywhere else I've found this question the answer was false so i hope that helps.
Answer:
p(x,n)
1. if(n==0) [if power is 0]
2. then result =1.
3.else
4. { result=1.
5. for i=1 to n.
6. { result = result * x. } [each time we multiply x once]
7. return result.
8. }
Let's count p(3,3)
3
0, so come to else part.
i=1: result = result *3 = 3
i=2: result = result *3 = 9
i=2: result = result *3 = 27
Explanation:
here the for loop at step 4 takes O(n) time and other steps take constant time. So overall time complexity = O(n)
<h2><u>
Answer:</u></h2>
relative.
<h2><u>
Explanation:</u></h2>
The coordinates for the section element need not be defined as long as its position is set to relative.
If the position is set as relative, then it will have no effect on the positioning attributes, it will consider as static position. If positioning is mentioned explicitly like top: 20px; then it will position 10 pixels down from where it is located. An ability for positional shifts is extremely helpful.
Two things happen when an element is set as relative, one is it introduces the ability to use z-index on that element, second is it limits the scope of absolutely positioned child elements.
