Looking at the slope of the "best-fit" line, you can see that for every two hours of homework, 15 more points are scored. (compare t=0 to t=2).
For t=5, the line seems to go through 47.5. So for t=7, which is two hours more, you'd expect a score of 47.5+15 = 62.5.
That answer is in the list, so I'd choose that.
In reality, you would never be able to have any score you like just by putting more hours in, so this can never be a straight line forever...
Answer:
1.67
Step-by-step explanation:
after the decimal we have the
tens
hundreths
thousanths
(usually math doesn't ask you to go farther than the thousanths place)
because 15/9 is 1.66666, you will go to the hundreths place and round that six. Six is one more than five so it gets rounded up. That changes the decimal to 1.67. You do not change it to 1.7, because it asked you to round to the nearest hundred not the nearest tens
Answer:
58.6% of the variation in length (in cm) of new born boys and their weight (in kg) is explained by the line of best fit.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following :
R² value = 58.6% comparing the length (cm) of new born boys to their weight (kg)
The R² value is called the Coefficient of determination. It is obtained by taking the square of the correlation Coefficient (R). The value gives the proportion of Variation between the independent and dependent variables which is explained by regression line. In the scenario above, the R² value means that 58.6% of the variation in length in centimeter of new born boys and their weight (in kg) is explained by the line of best fit. While (100% - 58.6% = 41.4%) is due to other factors.
Answer:
2+2 is 4-1=3 quick maths
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Option B
Step-by-step explanation:
f(t) = 5000
g(t) = 250t
h(t) = f(t) + g(t) = 5000 + 250t
After 5 years, the amount of money in the account is:
h(t = 5) = 5000 + 250(5) = 5000 + 1250 = 6250$
