Answer:
Mortgage, 20%, 80%
Explanation:
Typically required on Mortgage loans when the down payment is less than 20% and loan-to-value ratio is in excess of 80%. Loans with higher LTVs don't conform to Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac guidelines, so a lender may require PMI to offset the risk.
Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: did not.
Explanation:
The Kuehn v. Pub Zone is a court case where Karl Kuehn sued Maria Kerkoulas -the owner of Pub Zone bar in Union, New Jersey- because Kuehn was beaten by a motorcycle gang inside the men's bathroom of Pub Zone. Kerkoulas had knowledge of the irrational behavior of motorcycle gangs in the area though, on the day when the attack took place, the Pagan's gang surpassed security in Pub Zone yet Kerkoulas decided to attend them. Later, the gang was heading towards the back of the pub. Kerkoulas thought they were leaving but they were following Kuehn to the men's bathroom where he was seriously injured.
Kuehn sued Pub Zone and the jury awarded $300,000 in damages but the trial court judge overruled the jury's decision and Pub Zone ended up owing nothing to Kuehn. <em>The owner of a business is not the insurer of the customers and has no duty on any care of one of them until a major event occurs</em>. Then, even if Kerkoulas knew about the behavior of the motorcycle gang, she is not responsible for the care of Kuehn on the gang attacking him.
Answer:
612,936 shares
Explanation:
The computation of the number of shares of stock must be sold is shown below:
Before that we have to compute
Required sales proceeds net of spread is
= (Raise amount + estimated cost for legal and accounting fees) ÷ (1 - spread rate)
= ($14.9 million + $582,000) ÷ (1 - 0.0815)
= ($1,5482,000) ÷ (1 - 0.0815)
= $16,855,743.06
So, shares to be sold is
= $16,855,743.06 ÷ $27.50
= 612,936 shares
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
1.6
Explanation:
I just did my marketing quiz, it comes out at about 1.59 so 1.6
