Answer:
1. False
2. Shortage; Larger
Explanation:
1. A binding price ceiling is one that prevents the market from reaching its equilibrium. In this market, the equilibrium price is $25 therefore anything below $25 will be binding. A price ceiling below $25 per box is a binding ceiling.
2<em>. Assuming that the long-run demand for oranges is the same as the short-run demand, you would expect a binding price ceiling to result in a </em><em><u>shortage</u></em><em> that is </em><em><u>larger</u></em><em> in the long run than in the short run.</em>
In the long run, supply is more sensitive because farmers can decide to plant oranges on their land, to plant something else, or to sell their land altogether.
This means that a price ceiling in the long run will be less attractive to farmers so they might leave the market. If they do this then the shortage will be more as there are now less supplies in the market.
Answer:
A budget is a financial plan used to estimate future income and expenses. The budgeting process may be carried out by individuals or by organizations. Budgets help an entity determine whether it can continue to operate with its projected income and expenses.
Explanation:
thank me later
The first marketing law suggests that in order to be successful in the market, the marketers need to understand the customer's demand and identify the brand positioning of the product in the market. Therefore, the option C holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of marketing laws?</h3>
Marketing laws are the ones that are universally accepted principles followed by marketers in order to get successful position in the market. The first and foremost law tells about how one should position the brand in a market over the demand of customers.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of marketing laws.
Learn more about marketing laws here:
brainly.com/question/16264752
#SPJ4
The incomplete question has been completed below for better reference.
A. Understand customer's demands
B. Identify brand positioning
C. Both A and B
D. None of these
Answer:
The opportunity cost of that decision is - $250,000
Explanation:
For computing the opportunity cost, we have to use the formula of opportunity cost which is shown below:
= Return of project which is not chosen - the return of a chosen project
= $750,000 - $1,000,000
= - $250,000
Since in the question, it is given that the chosen project is X so we write the project X amount in the formula and the not chosen project of-course is Y.
Hence, the opportunity cost of that decision is - $250,000
Answer:
The answer is expectancy.
Explanation:
Expectancy theory is a concept developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964, where he postulated, that the strength an individual has in terms of his or her motivation to do an action, would appear when three components are satisfied to a certain value: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. The question above is relevant to the expectancy component, which is detailed as the belief that an individual has regarding their efforts would result in the individual choosing to perform an action. In the case of Martha, she wasn’t sure that her efforts in trying to win the contract would lead to her 10% raise (outcome, a component of instrumentality), and thus, she decided not to try.
